Loop fastening material

ABSTRACT

A touch fastener loop material has a non-woven web of fibers forming both a base and a field of high-tenacity hook-engageable loops extending outward from one broad side of the base. The fibers are arranged with a particularly low density while maintaining hook-engageability and usefulness as a fastening material.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to fibrous materials having a fastening surfacefrom which hook-engageable loops extend.

BACKGROUND

Touch fasteners are particularly desirable as fastening systems forlightweight, disposable garments, such as diapers. In an effort toprovide a cost-effective loop material, some have recommended variousalternatives to weaving or knitting, such as by needling a lightweightlayer of fibers to form a light, non-woven material that can then bestretched to achieve even lighter basis weight and cost efficiency, withthe loop structures anchored by various binding methods, andsubsequently adhered to a substrate. U.S. Pat. No. 6,329,016 teaches onesuch method, for example.

Materials with lower unit costs and better performance are desired.Reducing fiber content can lower cost, but can also affect overallperformance or load-carrying capacity of the loop material, as well asthe dimensional stability and handling efficiency of the loop product.Also, choice of fiber material is often compromised by a need for theloop material to be weld-compatible with a substrate (e.g., an outerlayer of a diaper) to which the loop material is to be permanentlybonded, and by the load-bearing requirements of the fastener loopfibers.

Various methods of bonding fibers to underlying substrates have alsobeen taught, for forming touch fasteners and other loop-bearingmaterials.

SUMMARY

We have identified a particular loop material characteristic that wecall Loop Loft Density (LLD), and various aspects of the inventionfeature a non-woven, hook-engageable fastener loop material having aLoop Loft Density of less than 1.3 gram per cubic inch (0.08 gram percubic centimeter), and particularly in a range of between 0.6 gram percubic inch (0.04 grain per cubic centimeter) and I gram per cubic inch(0.06 gram per cubic centimeter).

We have found that a hook-engageable non-woven loop material can befashioned with an LLD within this range while maintaining othercharacteristics necessary for reliable fastening, and can therebyprovide not only a particularly inexpensive fastener but also one thatpresents a loop field that is readily penetrated for engagement by hooksand in many case of a desirable surface compressibility and feel and adesirable overall hand.

For some applications we find particular advantage in combining thischaracteristic with one or more other loop material properties.

For example, some embodiments feature one or more characteristics of aproduct property that we call Fiber Volumetric Ratio. In particular, webelieve that manufacturing a fastener loop material to have a MaximumFiber Volumetric Ratio (MFVR, as defined herein within a particularnumeric range, while controlling where the MFVR occurs with respect tothe distribution of Fiber Volumetric Ratio over the thickness of theproduct, can provide for a particularly cost-efficient engageability formany fastening applications.

We have found, for example, that loop materials having tenacious loopsand fashioned to have an MFVR of between 5 and 25 percent, with the MFVRoccurring closer to a Rising 5% Ratio Elevation than to a Falling 5%Ratio Elevation (as defined herein), can result in materials that haveloop fields that are highly engageable for their weight.

We have also identified a particular characteristic that we callCritical Fiber Volume Percentage (CFVP), and have determined that CFVP,which we believe has not been previously appreciated, is a usefulmeasure of a property that can provide particular value in manyfastening applications if maintained below a certain level.

We have found, for example, that loop materials fashioned to have a CFVPof less than 60 percent, or between 60 percent and 20 percent, canprovide a particularly useful set of performance characteristics as wellas exceptional value, particularly when combined with the MFVRcharacteristics discussed herein. This can enable the commercial successof even more fastening applications, particularly disposable andsingle-use applications.

Because we appear to be the first to realize the significance of theseloop material characteristics, we provide below a clear test todetermine the LLD, MFVR and CFVP of a loop material.

One aspect of the invention features a touch fastener loop material withor of a non-woven web of fibers forming both a base and a field ofhook-engageable loops of a tenacity of at least 1.1 grams per denier (insome examples, at least 5, or at least 8 grams per denier) extendingoutward from one broad side of the base. The fibers are specificallydistributed such that the loop material has a Loop Loft Density ofbetween 0.6 and 1.3 gram per cable inch, in some cases between 0.8 and1.0 gram per cubic inch.

Some materials also exhibit a CFVP of between 20 and 60 percent, and/oran MFVR of between 5 and 25 percent (in some cases, between 10 and 15percent). Preferably, the MFVR occurs within a lower 30 percent of anelevation span between the Rising 5% Ratio Elevation and the Falling 5%Ratio Elevation.

Preferably, the material is constructed so as to have a peel strength ofat least 500 grams force per inch width when mated with an HTH725 hookand tested according to ASTM D5170-98, and/or a shear strength of atleast 8,000 grams force per square inch when mated with an HTH725 hookand tested according to ASTM D5169-98.

The touch fastener loop material can be constructed to be particularlyair-permeable for applications requiring breathability. Some suchexamples exhibit a Frazier air permeability of at least 500feet³/feet²/sec (150 m³ /m²/sec).

In many cases the touch fastener loop material has an overall thickness,determined as prescribed below, of less than about 1.5 millimeters, suchas between 1.0 and 1.5 mm.

For many fastening applications, such as those relating to disposable orsingle-use products, the web has an overall basis weight of between 20gsm and 70 gsm.

The fibers can include, or even consist essentially of, multicomponentfibers such as bicomponent fibers having a sheath of a lower meltingtemperature than a core within the sheath. In such cases the fibers maybe bonded within the base by resin of the sheath.

Some embodiments of the loop material consist essentially of thenon-woven web of fibers, bonded together by fused material of thefibers.

Another aspect of the invention features the loop material describedabove and a backing bonded across a surface of the base opposite thefield of loops. The backing may be air-permeable, and the loop materialand backing may be bonded together with an adhesive.

Yet another aspect of the invention features a touch fastener loopmaterial with or of a non-woven web of fibers forming both a base and afield of hook-engageable loops of a tenacity of at least 1.1 grams perdenier (in some examples, at least 5, or at least 8 grams per denier)extending outward from one broad side of the base. The fibers arespecifically distributed such that the field of loops has a MaximumFiber Volume Ratio of between 5 and 25 percent, and the loop materialhas a Loop Loft Density of between 0.6 and 1.8 gram per cubic inch.Various embodiments of such a loop material exhibit one or more of thefeatures or characteristics discussed above.

The touch fastener loop material can be fashioned such that the base isdimensionally stable, meaning that it is of sufficient strength to beprocessed as a web without tearing or excessive elongation, at least tothe point of being either laminated to another material or rolled fortransportation. In some cases a touch fastener is formed by bonding abacking (such as a film) across a surface of the base opposite the fieldof loops, such as by an adhesive lamination technique. In some cases theloop material is laminated to an air-impermeable backing, such that theresulting product can be manipulated by suction.

As will be understood by those skilled in this art, the LLD of anon-woven loop material is related to the average overall weight densityof the material with respect to effective engageable loop areas, and theMFVR and CFVP of a fibrous loop material are each, in different senses,related to efficiency of the use of fibers in the loop material. Partialembossing of a given non-woven loop material will, in most instances,increase the LLD of the material by decreasing its effective area.Similarly, adding to the mass of the fibers of the material willincrease the LLD, MFVR can be said to be related to the peak density ofmaterial that a male fastener element may encounter as in penetrates theworking part of the field of loops. CFVP, on the other hand, can be saidto be related to the proportion of the fiber mass of the material thatis within the volume of the material accessible to engagement by hooks.While these over-generalizations should not be taken as a strictdefinition of either characteristic, they will help to explain why webelieve that these characteristics are useful and significant parametersfor further study and development in the advance of fastening science.Furthermore, samples exhibiting MFVR and/or CFVP in the ranges discussedherein have demonstrated very good flexibility and softness, whilehaving web strengths suitable for processing and reliable attachment tovarious product surfaces.

The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth inthe accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features,objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from thedescription and drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1 and 2 are enlarged photographic side views of a loop product.

FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic plan view of a process for forming loopproduct.

FIG. 3A is diagrammatic plan view of a portion of the process of FIG. 3marked 3A.

FIG. 3B is a diagrammatic side view of a bonding stage of the process ofFIG. 3A marked 3B.

FIGS. 4A-4D are progressive diagrammatic side views detailing a needlingstage of the process of FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 is a highly enlarged diagrammatic side view of a loop structureformed by process of FIG. 3.

FIG. 6 is a top view of a specimen of loop material mounted to a supportcard.

FIG. 7 is a side view of the mounted loop specimen.

FIG. 7A is an enlarged view of area 7A of FIG. 7.

FIG. 8 is a graph of Fiber Volumetric Ratio for two sample loopproducts,

FIG. 9 is a side view of a touch fastener formed as a laminate of theloop product and a backing.

Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate a loop material 10 having fibers 12 that formboth a web 75 of fused fibers and a field of loops 56 extending from theweb. These views are taken toward an edge of the loop product andcentered about a particular loop structure for increased visibility ofboth the upstanding loops and the underlying web of fused fibers. Inthese examples the upper extent of the web, from which the loops extend,is generally discernable. As illustrated by the photographs, the productprovides an extensive field of hook-engageable loop fibers 56 supportedon a non-woven web 75 that is very thin in comparison to the loft of theloops. As is particularly discernable in FIG. 2, the outer web(fastening) surface from which the loop fibers extend features amultitude of visually discrete fibers entangled to form the web. Thus,the loop product's fastening surface provides a cloth-like appearancedesired in many applications involving wearable garments. As will bediscussed further below, the loops themselves extend from entanglementsin the web, and in many cases several loops extend from a commonentanglement.

A particularly high proportion of the mass of fibers 12 lies above theweb in the form of engageable loops 56, and in a portion of the volumeoccupied by loops above the web that is generally open and accessible toconventional male fastener elements, such as J-hooks, palm-tree hooks,or mushrooms. There is a sufficient proportion of fiber (and/or othermaterials) in web 75 to give the web dimensional stability within itsplane and to provide sufficient tensile strength for processing andadequate resistance to loop pullout for many fastening applications.

FIG. 3 illustrates a machine and process for producing loop material 10.Beginning at the upper left end of FIG. 3, a carded web of fibers 12 iscreated by an initial carding stage. As shown, weighed portions ofstaple fibers are fed to a carding station 14 by a card feeder 16. Inthis example, carding station 14 includes a 50-inch main cylinder 18 and27-inch doffer 20. The card feedroll drive includes a 2.25-inch feedroll 22 and a 9-inch lickerin roll 26 that transfers the fibers to maincylinder 18. An alternating pattern of 3-inch stripper rolls 26 and6-inch worker rolls 28 is distributed along the peripheral surface ofmain cylinder 18. In this example, carding station 14 includes sixworker-stripper pairs, with the stripper rolls driven at a surface speedtwo to three times faster than the worker rolls. Doffer 20 transferscarded web 12 to a 6-inch condenser roll 30, and a take-off roll 32deposits the carded web on a conveyor 42.

While the configuration shown and described herein is illustrative of anexample carding station for providing lengthwise-incoherent fiberssuitable for use in conjunction with various techniques presentlydisclosed, it should be understood that other methods of providing suchlengthwise-incoherent fibers are also contemplated (e.g., alternativecarding and air lay configurations).

During carding, the fibers are separated and combed into a cloth-likecontinuous layer consisting primarily of parallel fibers oriented toextend primarily along a length of the layer (carded web 12). The mathas virtually no strength when pulled in any direction because thefibers have been disentangled and are otherwise untethered. Thus, cardedweb 12 emerges from the carding station 14 as a “lengthwise-incoherent”layer of staple fibers, having little to no dimensional stability in thelengthwise direction, and will pull apart if attempted to be lifted fromthe conveyor.

In some embodiments, suitable fibers for forming the loop product 10 aredrawn and crimped fibers, 1.5 to 6 denier, of about 1-inch (about 2.5centimeters) to 4-inch (about 10 centimeters) staple length. Varioussynthetic or natural fibers may be employed. For example, in someapplications, combinations of natural fibers, such as wool and cotton,and synthetic, thermally fusible fibers, may provide sufficient loopstrength. Presently, however, thermoplastic staple fibers which havesubstantial tenacity are preferred for making thin, low-cost loopproduct that has good closure performance when paired with very smallmolded hooks. Suitable thermoplastic materials may include polymers,such as polyesters, polyamides, polyolefins (e.g., polypropylene andpolyethylene), acrylics, and rayon, as welt as blends and copolymers ofsuch polymers. In some embodiments, the carded web includes one or moremulticomponent fibers. Some multicomponent fibers are bicomponent fibersfeature an outer sheath and an inner core. Suitable bicomponent fibersmay include bicomponent polyester fibers and bicomponentpolyethylenelpolyester fibers. In some implementations, it may beparticularly advantageous to employ bicomponent fibers having a broadbonding window, where the inner core material has a much higher meltingpoint than the outer sheath material. In some embodiments, a blend ofdifferent types of fibers may be used. For example, a suitable fiberblend may include at least one “binder fiber” (i.e., a fiber having aparticularly tow melt temperature) and one or more “loop fibers” havingrelatively higher melt temperature and tenacity suitable for engagementwith male fastener elements. For example, the polyethylene sheath of asuitable bicomponent fiber may have a melting temperature of about 266°F. (about 130° C.) and the polyester core may have a melting temperatureof about 485° F. (about 252° C.). For a product having some electricalconductivity, a small percentage of metal fibers may be added. Forinstance, loop products of up to about 5 to 10 percent fine metal fiber,for example, may be advantageously employed for grounding or otherelectrical applications. In some embodiments, the composition of a fiberblend may include at least 50 percent binder fiber.

Loop fibers with tenacity values of at least 1.1 grams per denier havebeen found to provide good closure performance, and fibers with atenacity of at least 5 or more grams per denier (preferably even 8 ormore grams per denier) are even more preferred in many instances. Ingeneral terms for a loop-limited closure, the higher the loop tenacity,the stronger the closure. For many applications, particularly productswhere the hook-and-loop components will be engaged and disengaged morethan once (“cycled”), it is desirable that the loops have relativelyhigh strength so that they do not break or tear when the fastenerproduct is disengaged. Loop breakage causes the loop material to have a“fuzzy,” damaged appearance, and widespread breakage can deleteriouslyeffect re-engagement of the fastener. Loop strength impacts closureperformance and is proportional to fiber tenacity and denier. Fibershaving a fiber titer of at least 1.5 to 6 denier and a tenacity of atleast 1 to 7 grams/denier, provide sufficient loop strength for manyapplications. Where higher loop strength is required, fiber denier,tenacity, or both, may be increased. The loop fiber denier should bechosen with the hook size in mind, with lower denier fibers typicallyselected for use with smaller hooks. In applications for use with largerhooks, larger fiber titer and/or higher tenacity may be employed.

Referring again to FIG. 3, carded web 12, in its lengthwise-incoherentstate, is carried up conveyor 42 and deposited on a brush apron 44. Insome embodiments, brush apron 44 is provided in the form of a continuousbelt supporting a dense bed of upstanding flexible bristles. As shown,brush apron 44 is maintained to travel at a constant line speed along alinear path while carrying carded web 12 through various stations of themanufacturing process. In this example, brush apron 44 initially carriesthe dispensed carded web 12 to a needling station 46, where the cardedweb is repeatedly needle-punched. The needles may be guided through astripper plate above the fibers, and draw small pouches of fibersthrough the carded web to form loops on the opposite side. Duringneedling, carded web 12 is supported directly on the bristles of brushapron 44 (as shown in FIGS. 4A-4D), which moves with the carded webthrough needling station 46. In some embodiments, needling station 46needles carded web 12 with an overall penetration density of about 40 to160 punches per square centimeter.

In some embodiments, needling station 46 may be provided in the form ofa “structuring loom” configured to subject the fibers of carded web 12to a random velour process. Thus, the needles penetrate a moving bed ofbristles arranged in an array (brush apron 44). In some implementations,the needling station may feature a double-beam, random-velour needleloom. In a particular implementation, needle beams are fitted withneedle boards having a density of 7500 needles/meter. In thisimplementation, the needle loom was fitted with 40 gauge, 2.5 inchneedles cycled at a stroke amplitude of 40 millimeters and a strokefrequency of 2100 strokes per minute. In some implementations, theneedling station may feature two consecutive double-beam looms.

In some embodiments, brush apron 44 may have a nominal bristle densityof about 2500 bristles per square inch (about 380 bristles per squarecentimeter). The bristles are each about 0.008 inch (0.2 millimeter) indiameter and about 20-25 millimeters long, and are preferably straightwith rounded tips. In some embodiments, brush apron 44 includes aplurality of discrete brush segments 45 (see FIG. 3A) secured toaluminum slats driven by a continuous belt over a supporting steel deck.Alternatively, in some alternative embodiments, the bristles of brushapron 44 are directly attached to the continuous belt. The bristles maybe formed of any suitable material, for example 6/12 nylon. Suitablebrushes may be purchased commercially and retrofitted onto suitablelooms, Generally, the brush apron moves at the desired line speed.

FIGS. 4A through 4D sequentially illustrate the formation of a loopstructure by a suitable needling process, such as may be performed atneedling station 46. Initially, carded web 12 is conveyed to theneedling station by brush apron 44, with the individual fibers 48 of thecarded web carried directly on a bed of brush bristles 50 (FIG. 4A). Asa fork needle 52 enters carded web 12 (FIG. 4B), some individual fibers48 will be captured in the cavity 54 between the leading prongs of theforked end of the needle. As needle 52 “punches” through the carded web,these captured fibers 48 are drawn down with the needle into the bed ofbrush bristles 50. As shown, carded web 12 remains generally supportedon brush apron 44 through this process. Thus, the penetrating needle 52laterally displaces local brush bristles 50 as it intrudes upon brushapron 44. As needle 52 continues to penetrate (FIG. 4C) through brushbristles 50, tension is applied to the captured fibers 48, drawing themtightly around the penetration point. In this example, a totalpenetration depth “D_(p)” of up to about 10 millimeters, as measuredfrom the top surface of brush apron 44, was found to provide awell-formed loop structure without overly stretching fibers in theremaining web. Excessive penetration depth can draw loop-forming fibersfrom earlier-formed tufts, resulting in a less robust loop field.Penetration depths of 2 to 10 millimeters may also be implemented inthis example, with 2 millimeters to 4 millimeters penetration beingpresently preferred. When needle 52 is retracted from the bristle bed(FIG. 4D), the portions of the captured fibers 48 carried through brushbristles 50 remain in place having the form of a plurality of individualloops 56 effectively clamped between previously displaced—nowrecovered—bristles. With a punch depth of 2.5 mm, the resulting loopformation has an overall height “H_(L)” of about 0.040 to 0.060 inch (1to 1.5 millimeters), measured optically prior to compression or spoolingand while the loop product is free of any load, for engagement with thesize of male fastener elements commonly employed on disposable garmentsand such. It should be understood that additional needle types may beused; for example, felting needles or crown needles.

Advance of the carded web per needle stroke is limited due to a numberof constraints, including needle deflection and potential needlebreakage. Thus, it may be difficult to accommodate increases in linespeed and obtain an economical throughput by adjusting the advance perstroke. As a result, the alignment of the unbonded fibers may bedisturbed due to the travel of the web on the brush apron duringpenetration of the needle. For applications in which this effect isundesirable, an elliptical needling technique (such as described in U.S.Pat. No. 7,465,366 the entirety of which is incorporated herein byreference), or similar, can be used to reduce or eliminate relativemovement between the web and the penetrating needles. Using ellipticalneedling, it may be possible to obtain line speeds of 60 mpm(meters/minute) or greater, e.g., 120 mpm. Such speeds may be obtainedwith minimal disturbance of the unbonded fibers.

For needling longitudinally discontinuous regions of the material, suchas to create discrete loop regions, the needle boards can be populatedwith needles only in discrete regions, and the needling action pausedwhile the material is indexed through the loom between adjacent loopregions. Effective pausing of the needling action can be accomplished byaltering the penetration depth of the needles during needling, includingto needling depths at which the needles do not penetrate the carded web.Such needle looms are available from Autefa Solutions in Austria, forexample. Alternatively, means can be implemented to selectively activatesmaller banks of needles within the loom according to a control sequencethat causes the banks to be activated only when and where loopstructures are desired. Lanes of loops can be firmed by a needle loomwith lanes of needles separated by wide, needle-free lanes.

Referring back to FIG. 3, the needled product 58 leaves needling station46 in an unbonded state, and proceeds to a bonding station 60 while theloops 56 of fibers remain engaged within the bristle bed of brush apron44. At bonding station 60, portions of fibers exposed on the surface ofthe bristle bed, opposite the loops held by the bristles of brush apron44, are at least partially fused to create a dimensionally stable baselayer of the product. As illustrated in FIG. 3A, bonding station 60includes a heating section 62 and a cooling section 64 integrated by asingle, continuous conveyor belt 66, for example a Teflon® belt or abelt with similar heat-transfer and release properties. Heating section62 includes a bank of heating modules 68 operated by a controller 70.Similarly, cooling section 64 includes a bank of cooling modules 74operated by a controller 76. Conveyor belt 66 rides against therespective heating and cooling modules 68, 74 while simultaneouslycontacting needled product 58 to facilitate a bonding process withappropriate heating/cooling under pressure. During the bonding processthe surfaces in contact with each side of the product (e.g., conveyorbelt 66 and brush apron 44) move at the same longitudinal speed,avoiding relative motion at the fibers. Thus, conveyor belt 66 isoperated to match the line speed of brush apron 44 to avoid disturbingthe needled fibers with relative motion.

FIG. 3B provides an example illustration of needled product 58sandwiched between conveyor belt 66 and the bristles 50 of brush apron44. As shown, heat applied to the exposed fibers outside the brush apron44 creates a partially melted and fused fibrous web 75, while the loops56 of fibers secured between the bristles remain substantially unbonded.In some implementations, there may be a transition zone between thedenser, fused layer on the backside of the needled product 58 and theunfused layer on the front resting against the brush apron 44 wherethere is gradually less melting and fusing of the staple fibers. Thecharacteristics of this transition zone (e.g., degree of melting andfusing, thickness, etc.) may vary with different process parameters. Insome implementations, when bicomponent fibers are used, the bondingparameters may be selected so that only the outer sheaths of thebicomponent fibers are melted. Thus, the sheaths of the bicomponentfibers act as an adhesive agent to bond the fibers together, while thecores of the fibers remain substantially intact, maintaining theirintegrity. Further, in some examples, the melting and reforming of theouter sheaths at or near the base of the loops tends to support thecores of the fibers in an upright position when the loop structures arepulled from the brush apron.

Returning to FIG. 3A, in some embodiments, the heating and coolingmodules 68, 74 may be operated by the respective controllers 70, 76individually or in subgroups of staged heating/cooling zones along thelength and/or width of the heating and cooling conveyor belts 66, 72. Insome embodiments, heating modules 68 are operated such that the heatingzones provide a steadily increasing temperature profile in the “machinedirection” (i.e. the direction of travel of the needled product as it iscarried through the heating section on the brush apron 44). Theprogressive temperature profile may create the effect of a gradual “heatsoak” that steadily heats the exposed fibers (at least) up to an“activation temperature” (e.g., a melting or softening temperature ofthe outer sheath of a bicomponent fiber) at which the fibers begin tofuse together under relatively light pressure applied by the heatingconveyor belt. As one example, to achieve fusing at an activationtemperature of 300° F., the following heat profile provided in Table 1may be used:

TABLE 1 Heating Zone Temperature Heating Zone 1 125° F. (about 52° C. )Heating Zone 2 200° F. (about 93° C. ) Heating Zone 3 250° F. (about 21°C. ) Heating Zone 4 300° F. (about 149° C. ) Heating Zone 5 300° F.(about 149° C. ) Heating Zone 6 300° F. (about 149° C. ) Heating Zone 7200° F. (about 93° C. )

In the illustrated configuration, the bonding pressure exerted by theconveyor belt may be restricted to a relatively low level in order toavoid damage to the delicate needled product and the supporting bristlesof the brush apron. The progressive heat soak achieved by light pressurecontact with the conveyor belt over a relatively long dwell time (whichmay be achieved by providing a relatively lengthy heating section and/ora slower line speed) may provide consistent melting and amalgamation ofthe exposed fibers, which, after cooling, produces a cohesive andrelatively flat fused web 75 (see FIG. 3B). This process configurationmay also yield mitigating effects on curl and/or shrinkage in thecross-machine direction (widthwise) of the product.

In a particular example, the heating section may be configured having aheating tunnel length (L_(HT)) of about 3.5 meters, with 20 heatingmodules operated to create 5 staged temperature zones along the lengthof the conveyor belt and three staged temperature zones along the 1.6meter width of the conveyor belt. The heating modules may be operated tocreate temperature zones ranging from about 70° F. to about 400° F. Theline speed of the brush apron may be about 20 meters/minute to provide adwell time in the heating section of about 11 seconds. Further, in thisexample, the cooling section was configured having a cooling tunnellength (L_(CT)) of about 1.5 meters, with 10 cooling modules. Thecooling modules may be operated to create temperature zones of about 35°F. to about 70° F.

Referring back to FIG. 3, the loop product 10 leaves the bonding station60 as a lengthwise-coherent sheet-form article having sufficientdimensional stability to be removed from brush apron 44 via tensionapplied by a stripper roll 78, which pulls the loops 56 of fibers fromthe bed brush bristles. Removed from brush apron 44, loop product 10features a fastening layer having a plurality of exposed fastening loopsextending from an underlying fused web.

Loop material 10 is suitable for spooling and transport to a facilitywhere it can be unrolled and laminated directly to a product surface,such as a non-woven diaper chassis. In some cases, prior to spooling athin, non-porous backing film is laminated to the fused (back) side ofthe web to form a substantially impermeable product that can besubsequently processed using vacuum transport. In another example, afilm, such as a polyolefin film of about 0.001 inch (0.025 mm) inthickness, and with a basis weight of 0.369 osy (12.5 gsm), is laid overthe needled web before it enters the bonding station, and is fused insitu to the fibers to become part of the fused web. Other materials canbe bonded to the web, either as the fibers are fused or in a subsequentlamination process. Examples of such materials include other films, suchas elastomeric or stretchable films, other non-woven materials, andpaper. For example, FIG. 9 shows the loop material adhesively laminatedto an air-impermeable backing 900 by a separate adhesive 902, to form atouch fastener 904.

Other details of the above process can be found in pending U.S. patentapplication Ser. No. 14/610,625 “Needling Fibrous Webs,” filed Jan. 30,2015, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIG. 5 is an enlarged schematic view of a loop structure 80 containingmultiple loops 56 of individual fibers extending from a common trunk 82extending from the upper surface 108 of a web 75 of fused fibers, asformed by the above-described process. This view is intended toillustrate a general type of structure that can result from needling,and is not meant to imply that all, or even a majority of the loops inthe resulting loop field will be discernably part of such a structure.In many cases, availability of loops 56 for engagement with a matinghook product, is believed to be enhanced by vertical stiffness of trunk82 of the formation, which is augmented to the vertical stiffness oftrunk 82 of each formation, which is provided by the anchoring of thefibers at the web. Preferably, the web is fused such that each loopfiber is bonded at multiple points to other fibers within the web, toprovide sufficient resistance to loop pull-out during fastening uses,and to provide sufficient peel strength and shear strength. Further, asnoted above, the needling process tends to draw the fibers taught aroundthe point of penetration, which creates the stiffness in the trunk whenthe opposing ends of the loop fibers are fused within the web. Thisvertical stiffness acts to resist permanent crushing or flattening ofthe loop structures, which can occur when the loop material is spooledor when the finished product to which the loop material is later joinedis compressed for packaging. Resiliency of the trunk 82, especially atits juncture with web 75, enables structures 80 that have been “toppled”by heavy crush loads to right themselves when the load is removed. Thevarious loops 56 of structure 80 extend to different heights from web75, which is also believed to promote fastener performance. As eachstructure 80 is formed at a penetration site during needling, thedensity and location of the individual structures are very controllable.Preferably, there is sufficient distance between adjacent structures soas to enable good penetration of the field of formations by a field ofmating male fastener elements (not shown). Each of the loops 56 is of astaple fiber whose ends are fused to surrounding fibers of web 75, suchthat the loops are each structurally capable of hook engagement.

In part because the entire loop product 10 is manufactured solely fromstaple fibers, it can be manufactured having high air permeability, lowthickness and low weight with good closure performance characteristics.In some embodiments, web 75 can have a thickness “t_(b)” (see FIG. 5) ofonly about 0.015 inch (0.381 millimeter) or less, preferably less thanabout 0.005 inch (0.127 millimeter), and even as low as about 0.001 inch(0.025 millimeter) or slightly greater than the diameter of the fiber insome cases. The finished loop product 10 may have an overall thickness“T” of less than about 0.4 inch (10 millimeters), preferably less thanabout 0.16 inch (4 millimeters). The overall width of loop product 10may be approximately the same overall width as the layer of staplefibers provided on the brush (i.e., not exhibiting significant signs ofshrinkage). The overall weight of loop product 10, may be as low as 0.5ounces per square yard (17 grams per square meter). In some embodiments,loop product 10 has a Frazier air permeability of at least 500feet³/feet²/sec (150 m³/m²/sec). Preferably, loop product 10 has a peelstrength of at least 500 grams force per inch width (in some cases, 650grams force per inch width), and a shear strength of at least about8,000 grams force per square inch, when tested with HTH725 hookavailable from Velcro USA Inc. in accordance with test methods underASTM D5170-98 and ASTM D5169-98.

In addition to loop tenacity and loop strength (discussed above) thatare determined by fiber selection, closure performance is dependent onthe density and uniformity of the loop structures over the surface areaof the loop product. The techniques described above may be particularlyadvantageous in this regard compared to other known processes where acarded web of staple fibers is supported on a carrier sheet duringneedling. As a result, we have found that the presently describedtechniques yield a superior conversion rate of needle penetrations to“functional loops” (e.g., loop structures 80 that are suitable forengagement with male fastener elements) per unit area of theneedle-punched loop product, which corresponds to increased density. anduniformity. Thus, in some implementations, the loop product resultingfrom the above-described techniques can offer comparable or superiorclosure performance with lower tenacity and/or lower denier staplefibers. Therefore, loop product 10 can provide a good balance of lowcost, light weight and good closure performance.

In a particular implementation, a loop product manufactured from fiberETC233 available from ES FiberVisions, Inc. of Athens, Ga. ETC233 is a3.3 decitex, bicomponent fiber (55% polyester core, 45% polyethylenesheath) featuring 15 crimps per inch, a nominal fiber length of 51 mm,and tenacity of 2.7 cN/decitex. The fiber was processed in accordancewith the above-described techniques, including needling to a needlingdensity of 80 penetrations per square cm with 40 gauge, forked needlescycled to a penetration depth of 6 mm, was measured to have an overallthickness of approximately 0.055 inch and a basis weight of about 32grams per square meter (about 0.94 ounces per square yard). This loopproduct exhibited the following characteristics summarized in Table 2:

TABLE 2 Peel Strength (Tested with 700 gram-force/inch HTH725 under ASTMD5170-98) (about 275 gram-force/centimeter) Shear Strength (Tested with8,686 gram-force/inch² HTH725 under ASTM D5169-98) (about 1,346gram-force/centimeter²) Air Permeability 784 feet³/feet²/sec (239m³/m²/sec) Break Strength—Machine 5.8 pounds-force (about 25.8 DirectionNewtons) Percent Elongation—Machine 51% Direction Break Strength—CrossMachine 1.1 pounds-force (about 4.9 Direction Newtons) PercentElongation—Cross 60% Machine Direction Critical Fiber Volume Percentage34% (CFVP) Maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio 12.9% (MFVR) Loop Loft Density0.71 gram per cubic inch (0.04 gram per cubic centimeter)

Determining Loop Loft Density (LLD)

The following is a protocol by which Loop Loft Density is determined fora given loop material. If the loop material from which specimens areprepared is provided on a roll, the outer lap of the roll should beremoved and discarded. If the loop material is provided adhered to asurface of a product, such as a surface of a diaper, the loop materialshould be removed from the surface prior to testing. For example, a loopmaterial adhered to a diaper chassis can often be removed without damageto the loop material by spraying the loop material with chilled carbondioxide spray to deaden and release the adhesive. The loop materialshould be lightly scraped with a straight edge to help to mitigate anypermanent set of loop fibers caused by winding and storage, but notscraped so hard as to break the loop fibers. If the loop material issupplied in its as-manufactured state, prior to winding, scraping is notnecessary.

A specimen of the loop material the size of the Ames gage foot to beused for thickness measurement (discussed below) is cut (e.g., with handshears or a sharp punch) from a larger sheet. For example, ourmeasurements were made with a 1.129 inch (28.7 mm) diameter Ames gagefoot, and so we cut our specimens as discs of that diameter.

Determine the area (A) of the specimen, by taking the total area of theloop side of the specimen and subtracting the area of any discrete andbounded regions that do not contain functional loops. For example, thearea of any surface regions that have been embossed to fuse the loops tothe surface of the product should be subtracted from the specimen area.For clarity, we mean to subtract only areas having major lateraldimensions of at least 0.3 mm, as these represent areas in which loopfunction is essentially negligible when engaged with a field of malefastener elements.

Test the thickness of each specimen according to ASTM D1777-96(Reapproved 2011). This includes preconditioning the specimen bybringing it to approximate moisture equilibrium in standard atmospherefor preconditioning textiles, and then bringing the specimen to moistureequilibrium for testing in the standard atmosphere for testing textiles,both as specified in ASTM Practice D1776. Weigh each specimen todetermine its weight (W) in grams. Following the procedure outlined inASTM D1777-96 (Reapproved 2011), Option 5 (0.1 psi), determine thethickness (T) of the specimen.

Once weight (W), area (A) and thickness (T) have been determined, theLoop Loft Density is calculated as:

${LLD} = \frac{W}{T*A}$

Determining Maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio (MFVR)

The following is a protocol by which MFVR is determined for a given loopmaterial. If the loop material from which specimens are prepared isprovided on a roll, the outer lap of the roll should be removed anddiscarded. If the loop material is provided adhered to a surface of aproduct, such as a surface of a diaper, the loop material should beremoved from the surface prior to testing. For example, a loop materialadhered to a diaper chassis can often be removed without damage to theloop material by spraying the loop material with chilled carbon dioxidespray to deaden and release the adhesive. To remove a loop material froma diaper chassis, first open the diaper and place it on a flat surface,such as a table, such that the entire loop patch is exposed. Spray theface of the loop patch for two seconds with an aerosol coolant spray,such as CRC Freeze Spray, available from CRC Industries in Warminster,Pa. The loop patch should then peel off easily by gripping a smallportion on one end of the loop patch and peeling it from the chassis.

Whether cut from a roll or removed as a small patch from anothermaterial, the specimen should be conditioned in an atmosphere fortesting of 23±2° C. (73.4° F.±3.6° F.) and 50±5% relative humidity asdescribed in ASTM Practice D 618 for a period of 24 hours or until thespecimen reaches moisture equilibrium. Lay specimens out with thefunctional loop side up so that the conditioning atmosphere has freeaccess to the loop fibers.

Prior to mounting the specimen for CT analysis, the specimen should befurther prepared by the following fiber-lifting procedure. First, thespecimen is secured over a flat surface using tape at one end. A flatscraping edge, in the form of a steel block having an overall mass of0.23 kg and a rectangular contact surface of dimensions 32 mm by 0.5 mmand a leading edge radius of about 0.1 mm is placed on the loop materialadjacent the taped end. The contact surface should be in full contactwith the loop material and should be oriented such that in thesubsequent dragging process the block is dragged in the direction of itsshort dimension across the loop material. The fiber-lifting procedure iscompleted by dragging the block along the length of the specimen, underonly its own weight, at a rate of about 30 cm/sec, twice in the samedirection. Between passes the block is lifted from the specimen, suchthat the specimen is only subjected to the scraping process in onedirection.

Referring to FIGS. 6-7A, mount each specimen 600 to a separate 1/16 inch(1.5 mm) thick flat carbon fiber support 602 defining a 0.75 inch (19mm) hole 604 over which the loop specimen 600 is centered. The specimenmay be bonded with any adhesive that does not migrate into the loopmaterial directly over the hole 604 but that keeps the loop materialsecured to the support 602 during measurement. The loop material shouldbe mounted with no visible wrinkling or puckering, in a generally planarstate, and with the fastening (functional) surface facing away from thesupport. (If the specimen has two hook-engageable loop surfaces, the onewith greater loft should face away from the support) Allow the adhesiveto set, as needed. During the mounting process and throughout thefollowing scanning, the portion of the loop material specimen over thehole should not be touched or compressed.

By X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) methods, tomographic images (virtual‘slices’) of a test area of the specimen 600 are generated. Equipment tobe used for this purpose is a Nikon XTHS717225 CT machine fitted with aPerkin Elmer 1621EHS digital panel option, or functional equivalent. Aninitial scan is conducted over an area of 12 mm by 12 mm. If an initialscan determines that the sample backing is not flat then alignmentshould be corrected physically prior to proceeding further with thetest. Once satisfied that the sample is flat a final scan is conductedover the 12×12 mm area. The backing of this scan area is then furtheranalyzed to identify what visually appears to be the flattest portion ofthe sample, this comprises the Test Area. A representative Test Area maybe 4×3 mm, or 11×5 mm, or for example if only a small portion is flatthe size may be 1.5×1.5 mm. Although the sample must be flat it does notneed to be parallel to the plane of the support or the plane of scanningas this may be corrected electronically after the scan. This angle iscorrected by identifying 20 points that comprise the bottom of the baseof the sample. The plane that best fits to these 20 points is generatedand this serves as the zero position for all orthogonal scans.

The Test Area over which the following measurement is to be made is areasonably planar portion of the specimen within the area of the supporthole, encompassing any repeating pattern in the material, andrepresenting the overall material. For example, if the overall materialhas bond areas encompassing 30% of its overall area, the Test Areashould be selected to have a similar 30% bond area coverage. Formaterials having large repeating patterns, multiple measurements may betaken over adjacent areas and averaged to cover a full repeat of thepattern.

Planar X-ray CT images are generated at six-micron increments, parallelto the surface of the support. The lowermost image is taken below thelowermost extent of the sample material, and the uppermost image is atan elevation above the highest loop. (Note, it will be generally foundthat the highest images are not necessary for determining MFVR.) EachSlice Fiber Volume is calculated as the area occupied by material at theplane of the slice, projected over a six-micron elevation. The SliceFiber Volume of each image is tabulated with a corresponding SliceReference Position (the elevation of the lower side of the slice). Forexample, a Slice Reference Position of zero corresponds to a Slice FiberVolume running from a lowermost elevation of sample fiber up six micronsinto the base. At each Slice Reference Position, the Fiber VolumetricRatio is calculated as the Slice Fiber Volume divided by the totalvolume of the slice (i.e., the product of the test area and thethickness of the slice, in this case six microns). From the tabulatedFiber Volumetric Ratios, the Slice Reference Position (and thus, theelevation) of the Maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio (MFVR) is determined.

For example, here is a table of measurements of two sample loopmaterials. The MFVR of 12.9% (Sample A) and 18.3% (Sample B) arehighlighted in bold, and occur at elevations of 0.038 mm and 0.069 mm,respectively. Fiber Volumetric Ratio for each of the samples is plottedas a function of elevation in FIG. 8.

Slice Sample A Sample B Reference Slice Fiber Slice Fiber Position FiberVolumetric Fiber Volumetric (mm) Volume Ratio Volume Ratio 0.000000000.00018  0.0% 0.00010  0.0% 0.00631849 0.00202  0.4% 0.00082  0.2%0.01263698 0.00733  1.3% 0.00398  0.7% 0.01895547 0.01614  2.9% 0.01656 3.1% 0.02527396 0.03714  6.7% 0.03831  7.2% 0.03159245 0.06320 11.4%0.06190 11.6% 0.03791094 0.07181 12.9% 0.07575 14.1% 0.04422943 0.0694412.5% 0.08360 15.6% 0.05054792 0.06916 12.5% 0.09026 16.9% 0.056866410.06684 12.0% 0.09447 17.6% 0.06318490 0.06289 11.3% 0.09666 18.0%0.06950339 0.05657 10.2% 0.09795 18.3% 0.07582188 0.04985  9.0% 0.0968318.1% 0.08214037 0.04357  7.8% 0.09362 17.5% 0.08845886 0.03779  6.8%0.08979 16.8% 0.09477735 0.03341  6.0% 0.08704 16.3% 0.10109584 0.03020 5.4% 0.08406 15.7% 0.10741433 0.02740  4.9% 0.08100 15.1% 0.113732820.02452  4.4% 0.07781 14.5% 0.12005131 0.02161  3.9% 0.07502 14.0%0.12636980 0.01897  3.4% 0.0714  13.3% 0.13268829 0.01660  3.0% 0.0666112.4% 0.13900678 0.01466  2.6% 0.06101 11.4% 0.14532527 0.01327  2.4%0.05550 10.4% 0.15164376 0.01222  2.2% 0.04989  9.3% 0.15796225 0.01162 2.1% 0.04546  8.5% 0.16428074 0.04156  7.8% 0.17059923 0.03785  7.1%0.17691772 0.03456  6.5% 0.18323621 0.03137  5.9% 0.18955470 0.02842 5.3% 0.19587319 0.02612  4.9% 0.20219168 0.0233   4.4% 0.208510170.02107  3.9% 0.21482866 0.01952  3.6% 0.22134715 0.01848  3.5%0.16428074 0.00010  0.0% 0.17059923 0.00082  0.2% 0.17691772 0.00398 0.7% 0.18323621 0.01656  3.1% 0.18955470 0.03831  7.2%

Determining Rising and Falling 5% Ratio Elevations

The elevations where the Fiber Volumetric Ratio first rises above 5%,and then falls back below 5% are the Rising 5% Ratio Elevation and theFalling 5% Ratio Elevation, respectively. From the table above, Sample Ahas a Rising 5% Ratio Elevation of 0.025 mm and a Falling 5% RatioElevation of 0.107 mm, while Sample B has a Rising 5% Ratio Elevation of0.025 mm and a Falling 5% Ratio Elevation of 0.196 mm. In each sample,the maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio occurs closer to the Rising 5% RatioElevation than to the falling 5% Ratio Elevation.

The difference between these two values for a given sample representsthe normal elevation span over which the Fiber Volumetric Ratio remainsabove a critical threshold of five percent. For Sample A, this span is0.107-0.025 or 0.082 mm, and for sample B this span is 0.196-0.025 or0.171 mm. Preferably, the MFVR occurs within a lower 30 percent of thiselevation span.

Determining Critical Fiber Volume Percentage (CFVP)

Using the same specimen preparation and X-Ray CT methods discussedabove, the Test Volume is determined as the volume of the test area(within the plane of the specimen) projected over the orthogonaldistance between the lowest and highest elevations of sample materialwithin the test area. If an initial scan determines that the sample isgenerally aligned with a plane not parallel to the plane of thescanning, the alignment should be corrected, either physically or byelectronic reorientation prior to the final data scan. Total SampleVolume (TSV) is the total volume of material within the Test Volume. By‘sample material’ we mean the fibers entangled to form the loops andinterconnecting web between the loops, and any other material within theweb or otherwise not removable from the web without destruction of theweb itself. Thus, in specimens in which the base web of the loopmaterial contains binder embedded between sample fibers, the TSV willinclude the binder. Similarly, if the specimen includes other material(e.g., foam, ink) between the loops, the TSV will include the volume ofthose materials. If the specimen includes a backing that can be releasedby deactivation of adhesive, for example, such a backing should beremoved before testing.

From the tabulated Fiber Slice Volumes as generated above with respectto the calculation of Maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio, the maximum SliceFiber Volume and an elevation corresponding to the maximum Slice FiberVolume are determined. Each Slice Fiber Volume in the table isnormalized to a percentage of the maximum Slice Fiber Volume.

Proceeding back to front with respect to the specimen, a running totalof Slice Fiber Volumes is calculated and added to the table. The runningtotal of Slice Fiber Volumes comprises the total volume of solidmaterial at or below a given Slice Reference Position.

For each image, the Running Percentage (RP) is calculated by dividingthe corresponding running total of Slice Fiber Volumes by the TSV andmultiplying by 100, and added to the table.

The Critical Fiber Volume Percentage (CFVP) is identified as the RunningPercentage (RP) corresponding to an elevation where, moving upward withrespect to the specimen from an elevation corresponding to the maximumSlice Fiber Volume, the percentage of the maximum Slice Fiber Volumefirst drops to below 70%.

For example, here is a table of measurements of a specimen (Sample A ofthe above table) having a total sample volume of 1.70082 cubicmillimeters. The maximum Slice Fiber Volume is highlighted in bold, asis the entry where the percentage of the maximum Slice Fiber Volumefalls to below 70%, and the resulting Critical Fiber Volume Percentage(far right column). Based on this data, the CFVP of this material wouldbe 33.7%.

Running Slice Percent of total of Reference Slice maximum Slice RunningPosition Fiber Percentage Slice Fiber Fiber Percentage (inch) Volume ofTSV Volume Volume (RP) 0.00000000 0.00018 0.01058313 0.25066147 0.000180.010583130 0.00631849 0.00202 0.11876624 2.81297869 0.00220 0.1293493730.01263698 0.00733 0.43096859 10.2074920 0.00953 0.560317964 0.018955470.01614 0.94895403 22.4759783 0.02567 1.509271998 0.02527396 0.037142.18365259 51.7198162 0.06281 3.692924589 0.03159245 0.06320 3.7158547188.0100265 0.12601 7.408779295 0.03791094 0.07181 4.22208111 100.0000000.19782 11.63086041 0.04422943 0.06944 4.08273656 96.6996240 0.2672615.71359697 0.05054792 0.06916 4.06627391 96.3097062 0.33642 19.779870890.05686641 0.06684 3.92986912 93.0789584 0.40326 23.70974001 0.063184900.06289 3.69762820 87.5783317 0.46615 27.40736821 0.06950339 0.056573.32604273 78.7773291 0.52272 30.73341094 0.07582188 0.04985 2.9309391969.4193009 0.57257 33.66435014 0.08214037 0.04357 2.56170553 60.67400080.61614 36.22605567 0.08845886 0.03779 2.22186945 52.6249826 0.6539338.44792512 0.09477735 0.03341 1.96434661 46.5255535 0.68734 40.412271730.10109584 0.03020 1.77561412 42.0554240 0.71754 42.18788584 0.107414330.02740 1.61098764 38.1562456 0.74494 43.79887348 0.11373282 0.024521.44165755 34.1456622 0.76946 45.24053104 0.12005131 0.02161 1.2705636130.0933018 0.79107 46.51109465 0.12636980 0.01897 1.11534436 26.41693360.81004 47.62643901 0.13268829 0.01660 0.97599981 23.1165576 0.8266448.60243882 0.13900678 0.01466 0.86193718 20.4149840 0.84130 49.46437601

While a number of examples have been described for illustrationpurposes, the foregoing description is not intended to limit the scopeof the invention, which is defined by the scope of the appended claims.There are and will be other examples and modifications within the scopeof the following claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A touch fastener loop material comprising anon-woven web of fibers forming both a base and a field ofhook-engageable loops of a tenacity of at least 1.1 grams per denierextending outward from one broad side of the base, wherein the fibersare distributed such that the loop material has a Loop Loft Density ofbetween 0.6 and 1.3 gram per cubic inch.
 2. The touch fastener loopmaterial of claim 1, wherein the Loop Loft Density is between 0.8 and1.0.
 3. The touch fastener loop material of claim 1, having a CriticalFiber Volume Percentage of between 20 and 60 percent.
 4. The touchfastener loop material of claim 1, wherein the fibers are distributedsuch that the field of loops has a Maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio ofbetween 5 and 25 percent.
 5. The touch fastener loop material of claim4, wherein the Maximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio is between 10 and 15percent.
 6. The touch fastener loop material of claim 4, wherein theMaximum Fiber Volumetric Ratio occurs within a lower 30% of an elevationspan between the Rising 5% Ratio Elevation and the Falling 5% RatioElevation.
 7. The touch fastener loop material of claim 1, wherein thetenacity is at least 5 grams per denier.
 8. The touch fastener loopmaterial of claim 7, wherein the tenacity is at least 8 grams perdenier.
 9. The touch fastener loop material of claim 1, having a PeelStrength of at least 500 grams force per inch width when mated with anHTH725 hook and tested according to ASTM D5170-98.
 10. The touchfastener loop material of claim 1, having a Shear Strength of at least8,000 grams force per square inch when mated with an HTH725 hook andtested according to ASTM D5169-98.
 11. The touch fastener loop materialof claim 1, having Frazier air permeability of at least 500feet3/feet2/sec.
 12. The touch fastener loop material of claim 1, havingan overall thickness of less than about 1.5 millimeters.
 13. The touchfastener loop material of claim 1, wherein the web has an overall basisweight of between 20 gsm and 70 gsm.
 14. The touch fastener loopmaterial of claim 1, wherein the fibers comprise multicomponent fibers.15. The touch fastener loop material of claim 14, wherein themulticomponent fibers comprise bicomponent fibers having a sheath of alower melting temperature than a core within the sheath, and wherein thefibers are bonded within the base by resin of the sheath.
 16. The touchfastener loop material of claim 1, further comprising a film permanentlybonded to a side of the base opposite the field of loops.
 17. The touchfastener loop material of claim 16, wherein the loop material isair-impermeable.
 18. The touch fastener loop material of claim 1,consisting essentially of the non-woven web of fibers, bonded togetherby fused material of the fibers.
 19. The touch fastener loop material ofclaim 1, wherein the base is dimensionally stable.
 20. A touch fastenercomprising the loop material of claim 1 and a backing bonded across asurface of the base opposite the field of loops.
 21. A touch fastenerloop material comprising a non-woven web of fibers forming both a baseand a field of hook-engageable loops of a tenacity of at least 1.1 gramsper denier extending outward from one broad side of the base, whereinthe fibers are distributed such that the field of loops has a MaximumFiber Volume Ratio of between 5 and 25 percent, and the loop materialhas a Loop Loft Density of between 0.6 and 1.8 gram per cubic inch.